Amazing Story

This is a true story that had happened in 1892 at Stanford University. It’s moral is still relevant to-day.

A young, 18 year old student was struggling to pay his fees. He was an orphan, and not knowing where to turn for money, he came up with a bright idea. A friend and he decided to host a musical concert on campus to raise money for their education.

They reached out to the great pianist Ignacy J. Paderewski. His manager demanded a guaranteed fee of $ 2,000 for the piano recital. A deal was struck. And the boys began to work to make the concert a success.

The big day arrived. Paderewski performed at Stanford. But unfortunately, they had not managed to cell enough tickets. The total collection was $ 1,600. Disappointed, they went to Paderewski and explained their plight. They gave him the entire $ 1,600, plus a cheque for the balance of $ 400. They promised to honour the cheque soonest possible.

“No” said Paderewski. “This is not acceptable” He tore up the Cheque, returned the $1,600 and told the boys “Here’s the $1,600. Please deduct whatever expenses you have incurred. Keep the money you need for your fees. And just give me whatever is left” The boys were surprised, and thanked him profusely.

It was a small act of kindness. But it clearly marked out Paderewski as a great human being. Why should he help two people he did not even know? We all come across situations like these in our lives. And most of us only think “If I help them, what would happen to me?”

The truky great people think, “If I don’t help them, what will happen to them?” They don’t do it expecting something in return. They do it because they feel it’s the right thing to do.

Paderewski later went on to become the Prime Minister of Poland. He was a great leader, but unfortunately when the World War began, Poland was ravaged. There were over 1.5 million people starving in his country, and no money to feed them.

Paderewski did not know where to turn for help. He reached out to the US Food and Relief Administration for help.

The Head was a man called Herbert Hoover- who later went on to become the US President. Hoover agreed to help and quickly shipped tons of food grains to fee the starving Polish people. A calamity was averted.

Paderewski was relieved. He decided to go across to meet Hoover and personally thank him. When Paderewski began to thank Hoover for his noble gesture, Hoover quickly interjected and said, “You shouldn’t be thanking me, Mr. Prime Minister. You may not remember several years ago, you helped two young students go through college in the US. I was one of them.”

The World is wonderful place. What goes around usually comes around.

The world is all sexy

Passion reigns supreme in all parts of the world. The minds of people are filled with sexual thoughts. The world is all sexy. The whole world is under a tremendous sexual intoxication. All are deluded and move in the world with perverted intellects. It is all fashion, restaurants, hotels, dinners, dances, races and cinema. Their life ends in eating, drinking and procreating. That is all.

Passion has introduced new fashions not only in London, Paris, India, France, China and Lahore, but even in Madras amongst the Brahmin girls of orthodox families who apply Cherry Blossom Powder and Haze line Snow to their faces, instead of the sacred turmeric powder, and dress their hair like the French girls. This sort of vile imitation has crept into the mind of our boys and girls in India. The sacred percepts and teachings regarding sex of our ancient sages and Rishis have been totally ignored.

What a lamentable state! They will accept anything as true only if a Johnson and Johnson bring something by way of the theory of evolution, motion, atom, relativity or transcendentalism.

Shameful indeed! Their brains are all clogged with foreign particles. They do not have the brain to absorb anything good in others. There is a miserable degeneration in the present young men and women in India. This is the age when they cannot walk even a short distance without a Rickshaw, a car, a tram, a bicycle or a carriage. What an awful artificial life! Bobbing of the hair amongst the ladies in India has become a severe epidemic and has invaded the whole of India. This is all due to the mischief of passion and greed.

Young men of the present day indiscriminately imitate the West and this result in their own ruin. Men are swayed by lust. They lose their sense of righteousness, and of time and place. They never discriminate between right and wrong. They lose all sense of shame.

Man, with his boasted intellect, has to learn lessons from birds and animals. Even animals have more self-control than men. It is only the so-called man who has degraded himself much by indulgence. At the heat of sexual excitement, he repeats the same ignoble act again and again. He has not a bit of self-control. He is an absolute slave to passion. He is a puppet in the hands of passion. Like rabbits he procreates and brings forth countless children to swell up the numbers of beggars in the world. Lions, elephants, bulls and other powerful animals have better self-control than men. Lions cohabit only once in a year. After conception, the female animals will never allow the male animals to approach them till the young ones are weaned and they themselves become healthy and strong.

As a king is no king without a treasury, subjects and an army, as a flower is no flower without fragrance, as a river is no river without water, so also, a man is no man without Sexual feeling. Ahara, Nidra, Bhaya and Maithuna—food, sleep, fear and copulation—are common to both animals and men. That which differentiates a man from an animal is Dharma, Viveka and Vichara

Sakti. Jnana and Vichara can be secured only by the preservation of Veerya. If a man has not got these qualifications, he should really be reckoned as a veritable animal only.

The lust, which is the source of all enjoyments in this world, ceases, then all worldly bondage, which has its substratum in the mind, will cease. Even the most virulent poison is no poison when compared to lust. The former defiles one body only, whereas the latter adulterates many bodies in successive births. We are a slave of passions and desires, emotions and attractions. When are we going to rise up from this miserable state? Those persons, who, in spite of the knowledge of the non-existence of happiness, both in the past and in the present, in the baneful objects of the world, do yet entangle themselves in them with their thoughts clinging to them, deserve the appellation of an ass, if not a worse one. If you do not possess Viveka, if you do not try your best for salvation, if you spend your lifetime in eating, drinking and sleeping, you are a horizontal being only, having to learn some lessons from those animals, which possess far more self-restraint.

The sexual degradation that has overtaken mankind today is due directly to the fact that people have assumed that there is a natural "sexual instinct" in human beings. It is not so. The natural instinct is the procreative one. If men and women restrict sexual indulgence to mere procreation, then that itself is observance of Brahmacharya. As this is found to be impossible in the vast majority of cases, total abstinence is enjoined on those who seek the higher values of life. As far as the Sadhaka of burning Mumukshutva is concerned, celibacy is a sine qua non, as he cannot afford to waste his vital energy at all.

The gratification of every worldly desire is sinful; the flesh should be the object slave of the spirit intent upon divine things. Man was created for a life of spiritual communion with God, but he yielded to the seduction of evil demons that availed themselves of the sensuous side of his nature to draw him away from the contemplation of the divine and lead him to the earthly life. Moral goodness, therefore, consists in renouncing all sensuous pleasures, in separating from the world through discrimination and dispassion, in living solely after the spirit, in imitating the perfection and purity of God. Sensuality is inconsistent with wisdom and holiness. The great business of life is to avoid impurity.

Remember that you are not this perishable body of flesh and bones. You are the immortal, all pervading, Sat-Chit-Ananda Atman

Sex and spirituality ( Sambhog se Mokasha tak )

What a predicament – sex and spirituality! This is a tough nut to crack, and I wonder if anybody has really cracked it satisfactorily even after thousands of years. Of course, if we want to be free, it’s not sex itself that is the problems, but our relationship with it. The perennial question is: if we have sincere spiritual aspirations, then what is the best position to take in relationship to one of our most basic instincts? Well –and this is the fun part – it all depends who you ask!

The truth is, for most of us on the spiritual path, esoteric questions such as these, as intriguing as they are, really superfluous…. Why? Because the greatest challenge for most of sexuality at least is just not to make a mess of it, or as they say, create more karma. And if big gurus are apparently confused about the right relationship to sexuality what are we mere mortals supposed to do? Forget about the whole thing? Impossible!

Face it directly and try to come to terms with it? Sounds good, but who has the courage and heroic spirit necessary to really look into the eye of the tiger of sexual desire without the whole world falling apart? You see, so many of us open-minded, free thinking characters really are squares when it comes to this particular mega-life issue. What does that mean? It means that we don’t want to look at the whole question too personally because, for most of us, sex is more important than God. The promise of perfect happiness and deep contentment that the sexual experience represents creates a whole universe of attachment and selfhood that is far too important to us to be questioned.

Many people tend to misinterpret what I am saying whenever I mean about God and sexuality. This is such a loaded for most of us. It is very difficult to see clearly into this area of the human experience, especially when it relates to us. So what I am trying to do is present the facts, the definition of spiritual freedom is freedom from attachment.

Sex creates attachment that’s all there is to it. And this is why there is almost always an inherent conflict between the longing for inner freedom and the karmic consequences of the sexual / romantic experience. Therefore, the big question is: if enlightened freedom from attachment, then what are we all going to do about the relentless nature of sexual attraction?

I believe that if we want to be free, we can’t naively assume that there is a simple, ready-made answer to such a complex question. And if we are Sincere, we have to be willing to bear the burden of that complexity on our own shoulders and figure it out for ourselves.

In the end, if you want to be free, then all you need to know is that free means free from attachment. This simple fact transcends the relative matter of whether you are engaging in a sexual relationship or not. If you face this spiritual truth unflinchingly, then you will be looking into the heart of the matter. And this takes a lot more courage than blindly accepting someone else’s conclusion.

Sansaar se Bhaage firtey ho Bhagwan ko tum kya paogey

When you renounce the endless self-centred concerns of the separate ego and its small personal perspective then, spontaneously, you will find yourself there. This is where you will discover an absolute love, a bliss that is empty of attachment and free from the conviction that anything fundamental is missing. And it is this context that alone, which is one of inherent fullness and completing, that can make it possible for human beings to come together in personal intimacy and sexual communion in a way that is free from the pain, complexity, and unending confusion that are usually such an inherent part of this area of life.

Very few of us can really relate sex to the world of spiritual emancipation. This is because of our conditioning from the time we understand sex- that sexuality is something that needs to be hidden or something that needs to be frowned upon. Rarely do we come across anybody who knows or accepts that sex is neutral, that this can be so much a part of our spiritual experience. It is seemingly an incongruous combination. But the truth is that scared sex exists. And no, this is not a new fanged idea but it is something as old as our religion itself.

With so much focus on celibacy as the only way to enjoy spirituality people often ignore that intense sexual instinct provides a spiritual experience. In fact there are proponents of the belief that you do not necessarily have to lead a celibate life to be one with the supreme God. They say that high spiritual consciousness can actually free one from enjoying the power of sex, both physically and mentally.

The deeper you can love yourself in the true sense of the word, the deeper you can love God. Since you are God’s creation when you experience a great orgasm, you are rejoicing in the joy of connecting with the divine. So if you take sex out of its temporal context than you will see that a spiritual experience can grow out of this humblest of biological acts. However to experience that ultimate bliss where you are one with the divine, where you feel a cosmic energy rushing through you, needs practice and open mind and a willingness to surrender oneself completely without shame or guilt to your chosen partner. For in the true union of the two partners in scared sex lies the release of that cosmic energy.

It is surprising that in India, the place of origin for Kama Sutra and Tantra, sex is something that is frowned upon or even feared. Most of us treat our sexuality as something that should be talked about in hushed tones.

This unnatural fear may have risen from the fact that we often do not understand the awesome force of sexuality. It is true that intense desire actually blurs the mind or even creates confusion and a feeling of insecurity. The reason behind this sense of insecurity is the truth that intense desire also means letting of the ego- to be completely selfless, to seek other’s pleasure before achieving one’s climax and to seek total oneness with the significant other. But to be completely abandoned without a thought to another thing is something that is not easily possible for most people. Our desire to escape from its overwhelming intensity alone is what creates an antithetic view of sex where none actually exists.

So we tend to view sex either in a positive light or in a negative light. But the truth is that the sexual force that is inside us is neutral and is multidimensional at the same time. It is intense, natural and healthy, and represents the power of creation itself. It is in truth the creative energy that is in it a divine and a spiritual force. For if this energy did not exist within us then we would not be able to replicate God’s own act of creation, the mainstay of our existence on this planet.

Our ancients have said that (Spiritual) it is this same cosmic energy that is present in living beings as the sex force. So Hindu regarded this energy as sacred, something that is worthy of being worshipped, not fettered away. We also need to embrace the multidimensional nature of our sexual feelings. The human experience of the sexual instinct is never static, but it is ever changing. So it is physical, psychological, emotional and even spiritual.

(That is opening of the third eye of Lord Shiva- Name given to the process, whereby the full potential of man’s Biophysical, mental, emotional energy released, integrated and focused. )

Sexuality is an extremely powerful, primal and irreducible aspect of human nature. One of the contributions of the Tantric paradigm was the insight that sexual energies were being wasted in some forms of meditative practice. There is a Tantric teaching to the effect that without the practice of sexual union and without integrating one’s energies at that level, it is impossible to attain enlightenment in the present life-time.

This takes us to the fact that sex and spirituality are not two different paths but that one is the path to attain the other. Old Tantric practices of sacred sex or mystic sex showed that often the orgasmic bliss was sought by the practicenor to get a vision of the divinity. In today’s world the first concept still holds true, there is also the evolution of the concept where proponents of Tantra and scared sex are using the age-old system to strengthen man-woman relationships and their equation with each other.

Sex and ego

Go wherever you like—Amsterdam, London or New York. Chennai, Mumbai, Mizoram, Kochin, or Bengal------------ Analyze this world of phenomenal experience. You will find only two things—sex and ego.

The sex instinct is the greatest urge in human life. Sex energy or lust is the most deep-rooted instinct in man. Sex energy entirely fills the mind, intellect, Prana, senses and the whole body. It is the oldest of the factors that have gone into the constitution of the human being.

A man has a thousand and one desires. But the central strong desire is the sexual desire. The fundamental desire is the urge for a mate. All hang on this central basic desire. The desire for money, the desire for a son, the desire for property, the desire for houses, and other desires come later on.

Because the whole creation of this universe is to be kept up, God has made the sexual desire very, very powerful. Otherwise, many Jivanmuktas would have cropped up quite easily, just as graduates from universities. It is easy to get university qualifications. It demands a little money, memory, intelligence and a little strain. But it is an uphill climb to obliterate the sexual impulse.

This world is nothing but sex and ego. Ego is the chief thing. It is the basis. Sex hangs on the ego. If the ego is destroyed by Vichara or enquiry of "Who am I?", the sex idea takes to its heels by itself. Man, master of his destiny, has lost his divine glory and has become a slave, a tool, in the hands of sex and ego on account of ignorance. Sex and ego are the products of Avidya or nescience. One should have perfect knowledge of Sex.

"Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder".

'Beauty' has nothing to do with the eyes of the beholder!

The finding undermines the theory that people develop the idea of beauty from the experience of interacting with different individuals.

If this is so, than how can any statement be made about the biology of beauty? If everyone has their own idea of what is attractive and what is ugly, and these ideas vary from place and time to time, then what can possibly be said about the beauty-reaction of the human species, other than that it is a matter of personnel taste? The answer is that in every instance there do appear to be basic rules operating. These rules leave open the precise nature of the object of beauty, but explained how we come to possess a beauty- reaction in the first place and how it is governed and influenced to day.

If we ignore man made artifacts for the moment and concentrate on the response to natural objects; the first discovery to be made is that beauty objects are not isolated phenomena- they comes in-group. They can be classified. Flowers, butterflies, birds, rocks, trees, clouds, all the environmental elements, we find so attractive come in many different shapes, colors and sizes. When we look at anyone specimens we are seeing in our mind’s eye, every other specimen we have met before. When we see a new flower, we see it against our background knowledge of every other flower we have encounters previously. Our brain has started away all the information in a special file labelled ‘flowers’ and soon as our eyes settle on a new one, the visual impact it makes is instantly checked against all that stored data. What we are seeing really only because a flower after this complex compassion has been made.

In other words, the human brain functions as a magnificent. Classifying machine and every time we walk through landscape it is busy feeding in the new experience and comparing them with the old. The brain classifies everything we see. The survival value of this procedure is obvious enough. Our ancient ancestors like other mammals needed to know the details of the world around them. A monkey for instance, has to know many different kinds of trees and bushes in its forest home, and needs to be able to tell which one is poisonous and which thorny. If it is to survive, a monkey has to become a good Botanist. In the same way a lion has to become a good Zoologist, able to tell at a glance which prey species is which, how fast it can run and which escape pattern, it is likely to use.

Early man also had to become a master of observation, with our acute knowledge of every plant and animal, shape, color, pattern, movement, sound and smell. The only way to do this was to develop a powerful urge to classify; everything met with in daily life. It becomes important that it developed its own independent existence. It becomes as basic and distinct as the need to feed, mate or sleep. The human animal is a master classifier of information and almost, only classified information will do, providing it is encountered in the real environment and seen to be part of the world in which she / he lives.

It is texophilic urge that is at the root of our response to beauty. When we hear a new bird-song for the first time, or walk into a garden, we have not seen before. Our response to the sounds or to the arrangement of flowers may be intensely pleasurable and we have not seen before. Our response to the sounds or to the arrangement of flowers may be intensely pleasurable and we say “How beautiful.” The source of the pleasure seems to be the song itself, or the garden itself, but it is not. It is new experience as checked against all previous experiences in its particular category. The new song is instantaneously compared with all similar songs we have before the garden with all previous gardens we have seen. If we find beauty, it is comparative, not intrinsic, relative not absolute.

But if beautiful is a matter is classifiable relationships then so is ugliness, and it is still necessary to define the difference between the two. The answer lies in the way we have set up “our classes” when classifying the world around us. Each class or category is recognized, because certain sets of objects have common proportions, which make them similar but not identical. Lumping, them together on the basis of their shared properties is the way we arrange them in our minds.

Despite our countries innate modesty, there is no doubt that we are a body-fixated society. From the days of Madhubala, Nargis, Vaheeda Rahman, Sharmila Tagore, Zeenat Aman, Madhuri Dixit, AishwaraRai to Bipasha Basu and Mallika Sherawat today, it’s rather clear what Indian men want. The Male gaze is sometimes appreciative, often critical and always all pervasive.

Attraction, at deep, biological level, is all about survival of the species. So how male react to females stems from their perception of the latter’s health and capability to produce healthy offspring. A high waist-to –hip ratio and large breasts have been visual signals of fertility from time immemorial as well. The importance of physical appearance has been steadily rising since the ‘30s. As the media depict the most beautiful people in society, men and women alike have begun to place far more importance on appearance. For men, this can be to show his social status to other men and as they, cross-culturally, value a woman’s attractiveness not only for her reproductive potential, but also as a sign that they can obtain a high status, attractive woman.

"Attractiveness is not simply in the eye of the beholder. It's in the eye of the infant right from the moment of birth, and possibly before birth," the report quoted Alan Slater, lead author of the study, assaying.

The Exeter team tested infants averaging two days old, but the group also included some born only a few hours earlier. Each baby was held in front of the pictures and closely watched by researchers to the left and right. The observers followed the baby's eyes and pressed a button whenever the infant looked at the image on their side.

The researchers found that babies generally would flick their gaze between one picture and another, but spent significantly more time looking at the fashion model than the plain-looking woman

By repeated exposer to the various parts of the female body through music videos, ads or films, men are bound to lose interest in long-term intimate relationship, as they will value a woman only for her parts and not be able to develop the ability to relate to her. This is the reason, why most people experiencing problems in their intimate life.

Supposing, by contrast, we prefer more subdued, delicate bird-song or more restrained, quieter colors in our flower beds, what then? Our scale of values will differ, and our response to the new song or the new garden will not be the same we will find, them ever beauty or gaudy. It all depends on the previous experience that have been fed into the brain and which have established the rules of the song game or the flower game.

If stated boldly like this, these comments seem rather obvious, it must be remembered that the cherished idea that there is such a thing as intrinsic beauty still clings on touchiously and against all the evidence. Nowhere is this more vividly encountered them in the world of “feminine beauty.” The world of the human female form, of beauty contents and artists ideal models, for centuries men have argued over the finer points of feminine perfection, but no one has ever succeeded in settling the matter once and for all.

Beautiful girls still persist in changing shape as epoch succeeds epoch or as the girl watcher travels from society to society. In every instance there are fixed ideals, which are hotly defended. To one culture it is vitally important that a girl should be extremely plump, to another it is essential that she should be slender and willowy, to yet another she must have an hourglass shape with a tiny waist. As for the face, there is whole variety of preferred properties with almost every feature subject to different “beauty rules” in different regions and phases of history. Straight, pointed noses and small snub noses blue eyes or dark eyes. Fleshy lips or petal lips each have its followers.

Because of these variations an extraordinary situation develops. When attempts are made to find cross-cultural beauty queens, as in the Miss World or as Miss Universe contests, whether we move across space or time these are dramatic variations in the female body ideals, and all hope of finding an intrinsically perfect feminine beauty must be abandoned. These does not of course, mean that there are no basic human female signals, “Nor” does it mean those human males is necessarily lacking to inform responses to such signals. Gender signals and sexual invitation signals are present in our species, just as in any other. But sexual body signal of that kind are present in all human females, regardless of how ugly or beautiful each individual may be considered to be by local rules. An ugly girl can own a complete set of female anatomical features, possess efficient reproductive organs, be an excellent friend, and have a charming personality, and yet despite all this a human male may find her so visually unattractive that he cannot bring himself to mate with her.

This would be hard for a monkey to understand. A male monkey does not consider the comparative beauty of a female of his species. To him a female is female. There are no ugly monkeys. But the opposite sex and as beauty rated individuals. His highly developed taxophilic urge invades almost of all of his areas of interest, classifying and grading remorselessly as it spreads, and his response to human females is no exception. The result is that a tiny variation in says, the tilt of a nose or the curve of a cheek, can make all the difference between attraction and repulsion.

In fact, it now appears that everyone is born with a pre-programmed understanding of what makes a person attractive

Obviously, the precise set of the face or, for that matter, the exact measurements of the female breast, make little difference to the qualities of a female in practical term, as a life long breeding partner. But these are the subtle ties that have arisen as important elements in human beauty rating and which frequently play a part in mate selection.

This invasion of the sexual arena by our powerful aesthetic tendencies has led to a number of social curiosities. At one end of the scale there are the thriving industries of plastic surgery, beauty culture and cosmetics which enhance local visual appeal, so that female who may in reality he had cooks, poor mothers and selfish companions are able to promote themselves as potential mates of the highest order. At the other end of the scale are the lonely-hearts clubs that cater for at least some of the many isolated and rejected females who although they might be good cooks, excellent mothers and wonderful companions nevertheless remain alone and unmated merely because of their plain features or unacceptable figures.

If this trend were to grow it would eventually Lead to an increasingly wide gulf between the “beautiful” people and the “ugly” as beauty married beauty and ugly married ugly. When people marry, mate selection is often based on the partner’s beauty rating rather than on their qualities as life long breeding companions. As a result such pair bonds are frequently unsuccessful. Several factors help to prevent this, not the least of that is the fact that a “Rich ugly” may sometimes be preferred to a “poor beauty”. Also many individuals refuse to allow their compulsive beauty rating to dominate mate-selection when the final, crucial moment of decision arrives. Instead they make their choice on more appropriate grounds, even though they have always paid up service to the aesthetic appeals of the human body. Even after establishing a mate ship such individuals may continue to play the human beauty game, when assessing film stars, pin-ups or passers by in the street, but they relegate it to their fantasy worlds and do not permit aesthetic invasions to over power their real life breeding systems.

But what is the meaning of sex how it came in to existence and what is the importance of sex in Human life, one has to understand this first then only we will be justifying the sex knowledge importance.

Beauty is a mental concept

Maya havocs through the imagination of the mind. Woman is not beautiful, but the imagination is beautiful. Sugar is not sweet, but the imagination is sweet. Food is not palatable, but the imagination is palatable. Man is not weak, but the imagination is weak. Understand the nature of Maya and mind and become wise. Curb this imagination of the mind by Vichara or right thinking and rest in Brahman wherein there is neither imagination nor thought.

Beauty and ugliness are false imaginations of the mind. Mind itself is a false illusory product. Conceptions of the mind also must therefore be false. They are all like a mirage in the desert. What is beautiful for you is ugly for another. Beauty and ugliness are relative terms. Beauty is only a mental concept. It is only a mental projection. It is only a civilized man who talks much of the symmetry of form, good features, graceful gait, elegance of manners and graceful form.

An African Negro has no idea of all these things. Real beauty is in the Self only. Beauty resides in the mind and not in the objects. Mango is not sweet; the idea of mango is sweet. It is all Vritti. It is all mental deception, mental conception, mental creation, mental Srishti. Destroy the Vritti; beauty vanishes. The husband stretches his own idea of beauty in his ugly wife and finds her very beautiful through passion. Shakespeare has rightly expressed this in his "Mid-summer-Night’s Dream": "Cupid is painted blind. It finds Helen’s beauty in the brow of Egypt".

The Indriyas and the mind delude you at every moment. They are your real enemies. Beauty is a product of mental creation. Beauty is a product of the imagination. An ugly woman appears very beautiful only in the eyes of her husband. Where is the beauty, in the wrinkled skin of an old woman? Where is the beauty when your wife is bedridden? Where is the beauty when your wife gets angry? Where is the beauty in the dead body of a woman? The beauty in the face is a mere reflection. The real un-decaying Beauty of beauties—the fountain of beauties—can be found in the Atman only. You have ignored the substance and caught hold of a broken piece of glass. What a serious blunder have you committed by your impure thoughts, impure mind, impure Buddhi and impure way of living! Have you realized your mistake? Will you open your eyes at least now?

A beautiful wife is very charming. She is very sweet when she is young, when she smiles, when she puts on beautiful dress, when she sings and when she dances. But she is horrible to look at when she loses her temper, when she quarrels with her husband for not getting silk sarees and gold necklace, when she suffers from acute abdominal colic or some such disease and when she becomes old.

For a few years Nature bestows on woman her gift of special beauty, charm and elegance in order that she may capture the hearts of men. Beauty is skin-deep only. It will soon fade, the hair will become gray and the skin will soon be filled with wrinkles. The tailor, the weaver, the embroiderer, the toilet maker and the goldsmith make us beautiful for a few seconds. Man, in his excitement, infatuation and delusion, forgets this point. This is Maya. Never trust this Maya.

In this Kalyuga we find a change now Researcher has reason out in many aspect.

A team of researchers from the University of Exeter have revealed in a new study that infants just a few hours old showed their preference for attractive faces compared to plain ones.

According to The Daily Mail, the researchers came to the conclusion after carrying out the study that if photos of an attractive fashion model and a plain-looking woman are kept together, newborns will be drawn towards the prettier face.

The finding undermines the theory that people develop the idea of beauty from the experience of interacting with different individuals

In fact, it now appears that everyone is born with a pre-programmed understanding of what makes a person attractive.

"Attractiveness is not simply in the eye of the beholder. It's in the eye of the infant right from the moment of birth, and possibly before birth,"

The researchers found that babies generally would flick their gaze between one picture and another, but spent significantly more time looking at the fashion model than the plain-looking woman.

The Exeter team tested infants averaging two days old, but the group also included some born only a few hours earlier. Each baby was held in front of the pictures and closely watched by researchers to the left and right.

Wake up! What is Truth…………….? and will remain truth…………… Find out the Beauty of beauties, which is within you, which is your innermost Self. Woman should sing like Mira and merge in Mira’s Girdhar Nagar. Have we ever paused and considered what constitutes the basic’ ladies who excite lust in us? A bundle of bones, flesh, blood, urine, facial matter, pus, perspiration, phlegm and other dirt! Will we allow such a bundle to become the master of our thoughts? Will we exchange our birthright of eternal peace and happiness for such a fleeting, filthy mess of pottage? Shame on us! Were we will, we reason and our discrimination given to us only for such an inglorious end? Have we not heard and seen that physical beauty is only skin-deep and at the mercy of every passing accident, illness and year?

Perpetuation of the Species

Because provision was made by the Cosmic Intelligence Power that we call para-Brahman. and the Cosmic Force that we call Para-shakti., Adi-shakti., Maha-shakti., it has been possible that different species of living creatures, different species of plant life, botanical life, has lived, developed and evolved through the ages. This perpetuation of the species is the law of life in the entire universe, in every form of life, not only human, animal or sub-animal—insect, reptile, and fish— but even in the botanical world. How there is cross pollination and how the flower is the means of carrying out this act of reproduction, it is an intricate, mysterious marvel! Those who study it will be amazed at the wonderful science behind it; will marvel at this unknown mysterious Cosmic Intelligence that has brought this process about. One is struck with awe and admiration when one begins to go deeper into the process of how life is perpetuated on every level, every plane and every field of life, even from the most rudimentary life of a single cell, how it splits, divides itself and multiplies.

How wonderful that a seed is able to germinate due to the presence of two factors, so that the power of these factors gives it that mighty force of even breaking through rock, breaking through the pressure of heavy soil over it—a tiny, tender little thing like a seed that has just germinated. What a miracle! What great force! It cleaves the earth ten times harder than its tender shoot, and surfaces. If by chance a seed has been deposited on the top of a concrete terrace, when it germinates it even breaks through bricks and cement walls and displaces them and puts forth its own life.

This act of multiplying and reproducing is present everywhere. It saturates and permeates the whole universe because from the angle of cosmology, the entire universe is the outcome of such a primal first wish for multiplication. "I am one, may I become many." Thus the Vedas say that there was one imponderable, mysterious being. What that being was, who knows, because that Being was one without a second. So, a second not being present, not existing how can there arise the question of anyone cognizing that Being? Who was there to cognize when that-Ekameva dvitiyam Brahma. (God) alone existed. And in that mysterious Being there arose this germ of an idea. He thought: "May I become many. I am one, may I become many."

That is how they try to explain the genesis of the advitiya and the aneka from the Ekameva ’dvitiya. And, therefore, the concept of multiplication is at the very heart and essence of existence because it arose from Brahma and therefore it is present everywhere. In the Bible it is put in a different way. God created man and told him: "Go forth and multiply." And, if you delve into the scriptures of all religions, you will find that somewhere or the other this fact is there.

Therefore, the great Cosmic Intelligence and Power called God or Paramatman, the Supreme Soul or the Universal Spirit, permeates and indwells everything that exists. And thus when there is a provision made in a certain period of life then it takes on the nature of a very, very sacred act. Because, ultimately the atman is not created, what is created by the parents, human or sub-human, is only a vehicle for the entry into the earth plane of a spirit, a nucleus of consciousness. And the creation of this receptacle is an act wherein the partners in a marital state co-operate with Brahma, the creator—Srishtikarta Brahma. So they take on a certain part of Brahma’s. function. Therefore it is sacred.

The description is a beautifully related the Human physiology Verses Veda by Dr. Tony Nadar in his book.

The Cell:- The basic unit of Human physiology – From the Unified field emerge quantum waves, which are the basis of what is seen in classical Physics as elementary particles. Elementary particles assemble to form atoms. Atoms groups together to form molecules. The most complex molecules are organic molecules. These organic molecules assemble to form the most complex organic molecule known as DNA (Deoxyribonucleic acid Carrying genetic information in chromosomes). The basic structure of DNA reflects/ contains the structure of the information necessary to build and maintain the function of the basic unit of the physiology- The cell. The cell is made of a collection of organic and inorganic molecules, which are assembled in a very precise and orderly manner. This precise and orderly structure of every cell and its components gives it the possibility of fulfilling specific function and allows it to maintain and reproduce itself.

The DNA is densely packed in the center of the cell. Various long segments of DNA wind around each other to form chromosomes. Chromosomes are paired, with half of the chromosomes of each cell coming from the father and half from the mother. The chromosomes of each cell are contained in a spherical structure in the cell center called the cell nucleus.

The bodies of different types of cells have different shapes. Most cells, however have a rather spiracle or ellipsoid shape. Complex tubules and membranes hold the structure of the cell together, and these are called the cell skeleton or cyto skeleton. The outer wall of the cell is called the cell membrane.

On the cell membrane there are pores and different types of ‘gate ways’. Some of these ‘gateways’ are selective and allow only certain types of molecules to pass through, or they respond in special and elaborate “attachments” to the cell membrane are called receptors. Receptors respond and interact via transmitters with the cell environment and the cell nucleus. They keep the DNA informed!

Within the cell body are organelles that perform various functions that maintain the cell and create energy through the specialized process of transformation and metabolism. The cell nucleus acts like a silent catalyst, a silent witness which, togetherness with the cell receptors, the nervous system and epidermis with its receptors (formed by the ectoderm tissue) correspond to the cell nucleus and the cell receptors. The internal organ of the body (formed by the endodermal tissue) corresponds to the cell nucleus organelles.

Embryological Development- from 1 to many- The steps that lead to the formation of a complete living organism such as a human being starts from union of 2 special cells, each containing half of the normal number of chromosomes. This process is called fertilization.

One cell is rather stationary and ‘Silent’. The second cell has a tail that vibrates, allowing it to migrate with high energy and speed towards the first cell. It is therefore dynamic.

This is how the process of fertilization can be seen as the coming together of silence and dynamism. Dynamism collapsing on to silence in the first event, which leads to the many sequential steps necessary for the formation of an organism.

At the same time, the newly formed cell, with its newly assembled pairs & chromosomes, starts a very dynamic process of multiplication. (That is how in Upnishad they try to explain the genesis of the advitiya and the aneka from the Ekameva ’dvitiya. And, therefore, the concept of multiplication is at the very heart and essence of existence because it arose from Brahma and therefore it is present everywhere.) The 2 primordial cells, whose chromosome was silent suddenly, become very dynamic when they unite. This is dynamism starting from silence. Silence leading to dynamism.

Since everything in creation, everything in the Universe is always changing, always dynamic. The “moments” of experience are in fact point of dynamism. They have no dynamism. They are infinitely silent. The term ‘Point’ is used in a mathematical sense. A point in mathematics has no dimensions. Even though we say, for example, that a line is made out of points. There is an infinite number, of points in any line! A point is the smallest possible value. When an expression such as ‘The point of dynamism” is used means Zero dynamism. I.e. total silence. The point of silence will refer to zero silence. i.e. infinite dynamism.

The First Cell- 3-in-1- As earlier described every cell contains 3 distinct aspects

1. The Nucleus
2. The cell body and its organelles and
3. The cell membranes and cell Skeleton.

Their togetherness in one structure, which we call the cell. We therefore already have the reality of 3-in-1 in the very first cell, as well as within each cell of any living organism.

The Zygote migrates and divides- from 1 to 8. The technical term for the first cell, which results from the union of two primordial cells described above, is a Zygote. The Zygote divides into 2 cells, each of which in turn divides into 2 cells, etc. in this way within 3 steps there is progress on from 1 cell to 2, to 4, to 8.

After development of the first 8 cells from the Zygote, after which the Zygote enters the uterus, where it is implanted. The timing is also significant. In term of three steps: The 8 cells stage is reached the third day after fertilization. (It takes 3 rotations of the earth around its axis, with three sunrises and 3 sunsets, to reach that stage here again we see the value of 3 steps).