Who Is Shiva: Man, Myth
or Divine?
Who
is Shiva? Many stories and legends surround this most prominent figure of
Indian spiritual traditions. Is he a god? Or a myth constructed from Hindu
culture’s collective imagination? Or is there a deeper meaning to Shiva,
revealed only to those who seek?
Sadhguru:
When we say “Shiva,” there are two fundamental aspects that we are referring
to. The word “Shiva” means literally, “that which is not.” Today, modern
science is proving to us that everything comes from nothing and goes back to
nothing. The basis of existence and the fundamental quality of the cosmos is
vast nothingness. The galaxies are just a small happening – a sprinkling. The rest
is all vast empty space, which is referred to as Shiva. That is the womb from
which everything is born, and that is the oblivion into which everything is
sucked back. Everything comes from Shiva and goes back to Shiva.
The
word “Shiva” means literally, “that which is not.” On another level, when we
say “Shiva,” we are referring to a certain yogi, the Adiyogi or the first yogi,
and also the Adi Guru, the first Guru.
So
Shiva is described as a non-being, not as a being. Shiva is not described as
light, but as darkness. Humanity has gone about eulogizing light only because
of the nature of the visual apparatus that they carry. Otherwise, the only
thing that is always is darkness. Light is a limited happening in the sense
that any source of light – whether a light bulb or the sun – will eventually
lose its ability to give out light. Light is not eternal. It is always a
limited possibility because it happens and it ends. Darkness is a much bigger
possibility than light. Nothing needs to burn, it is always – it is eternal.
Darkness is everywhere. It is the only thing that is all pervading.
But
if I say “divine darkness,” people think I am a devil worshiper or something.
In fact, in some places in the West it is being propagated that Shiva is a
demon! But if you look at it as a concept, there isn’t a more intelligent
concept on the planet about the whole process of creation and how it has
happened. I have been talking about this in scientific terms without using the
word “Shiva” to scientists around the world, and they are amazed, “Is this so?
This was known? When?” We have known this for thousands of years. Almost every
peasant in India knows about it unconsciously. He talks about it without even
knowing the science behind it.
The
First Yogi
On
another level, when we say “Shiva,” we are referring to a certain yogi, the
Adiyogi or the first yogi, and also the Adi Guru, the first Guru, who is the
basis of what we know as the yogic science today. Yoga does not mean standing
on your head or holding your breath. Yoga is the science and technology to know
the essential nature of how this life is created and how it can be taken to its
ultimate possibility.
One
and the Same
So
“Shiva” refers to both “that which is not,” and Adiyogi, because in many ways,
they are synonymous. This being, who is a yogi, and that non-being, which is
the basis of the existence, are the same, because to call someone a yogi means
he has experienced the existence as himself. If you have to contain the
existence within you even for a moment as an experience, you have to be that
nothingness. Only nothingness can hold everything. Something can never hold
everything. A vessel cannot hold an ocean. This planet can hold an ocean, but
it cannot hold the solar system. The solar system can hold these few planets
and the sun, but it cannot hold the rest of the galaxy. If you go progressively
like this, ultimately you will see it is only nothingness that can hold
everything. The word “yoga” means “union.” A yogi is one who has experienced
the union. That means, at least for one moment, he has been absolute
nothingness.
When
we talk about Shiva as “that which is not,” and Shiva as a yogi, in a way they
are synonymous, yet they are two different aspects. Because India is a
dialectical culture, we shift from this to that and that to this effortlessly.
One moment we talk about Shiva as the ultimate, the next moment we talk about
Shiva as the man who gave us this whole process of yoga.
Who
Shiva is Not!
Unfortunately,
most people today have been introduced to Shiva only through Indian calendar
art. They have made him a chubby-cheeked, blue-colored man because the calendar
artist has only one face. If you ask for Krishna, he will put a flute in his
hand. If you ask for Rama, he will put a bow in his hand. If you ask for Shiva,
he will put a moon on his head, and that’s it!
Every
time I see these calendars, I always decide to never ever sit in front of a
painter. Photographs are all right – they capture you whichever way you are. If
you look like a devil, you look like a devil. Why would a yogi like Shiva look
chubby-cheeked? If you showed him skinny it would be okay, but a chubby-cheek
Shiva – how is that?
In
the yogic culture, Shiva is not seen as a God. He was a being who walked this
land and lived in the Himalayan region. As the very source of the yogic
traditions, his contribution in the making of human consciousness is too
phenomenal to be ignored. Every possible way in which you could approach and
transform the human mechanism into an ultimate possibility was explored
thousands years ago. The sophistication of it is unbelievable. The question of
whether people were so sophisticated at that time is irrelevant because this
did not come from a certain civilization or thought process. This came from an
inner realization. This had nothing to do with what was happening around him.
It was just an outpouring of himself. In great detail, he gave a meaning and a
possibility of what you could do with every point in the human mechanism. You
cannot change a single thing even today because he said everything that could
be said in such beautiful and intelligent ways. You can only spend your
lifetime trying to decipher it.
In
this country, in ancient times, temples were built mostly for Shiva, no one
else. It was only in the last 1000 or so years that other temples came up. The
word “Shiva” literally means “that which is not.” So the temple was built for
“that which is not.” “That which is” is physical manifestation; “that which is
not” is that which is beyond the physical. A temple is a hole through which you
enter into a space which is not. There are thousands of Shiva temples in the
country, and most of them don’t have any form as such. They just have a
representative form and generally it is a Linga.
No comments:
Post a Comment